Found out about this company on the Style page of the WSJ. Storeadore.com is a website that will help people find great shopping when they are visiting other cities. According to the Ins and Outs column by Jennifer Sarnow and Ray Smith,

The site, launched earlier this year by avid shoppers Meredith Barnett and Cristina Miller, who roomed together at Harvard Business School, profiles boutiques in New York City, the Hamptons, Los Angeles, Boston, Chicago, Philadelphia and Washington, D.C., as well as online stores. San Francisco will be added in August and Miami, Dallas, Houston and Atlanta in the fall.

Here is their website and here is a little bit about them.

Earlier this year, Zoltan and I were discussing a possible paper for me to write as part of a ‘directed reading.’ Over time Zoltan recommended that I look into Frederick Jackson Turner’s The Significance of the Frontier in American History. Turner argues it is the frontier experience, rather than European influence, that led to the development of America’s unique political, social and economic systems.

I am in the midst of finishing the draft of a paper in which I use Turner’s frontier attributes/frameworks to analyze the university/college campus environment from an entrepreneurial perspective. Found the money quote below while reading through the 1921 book edition of his thesis.

The pioneer was taught in the school of experience that the crops of one area would not do for a new frontier; that the scythe of the clearing must be replaced by the reaper of the prairies. He was forced to make old tools serve new uses; to shape former habits, institutions and ideas to changed conditions; and to find new means when the old proved inapplicable. He was building a new society as well as breaking new soil; he had the ideal of nonconformity and of change. He rebelled against the conventional.

Besides the ideals of conquest and of discovery, the pioneer had the ideal of personal development, free from social and governmental constraint.

More to come on this subject as I flesh out the paper over the next week or so, but this sounds like a lot of campus entrepreneurs. Especially the newer wave of social entrepreneurs.

Found this article about eccentric British Media entrepreneur Felix Dennis in which he states that “the best time to get started is in a recession.”

From the article,

Despite what he anticipates to be his fourth recession—“we are talking ourselves into it”—starting in America, Mr Dennis remains bullish on the land of the free. “For the rest of my lifetime I’m betting on America,” he says, noting the country’s “pervasive aura of optimism”.

One of the reasons now is a great time according to the article is that large and medium sized firms pull back in these environments, trying to conserve and survive. This leaves lots of opportunities for entrepreneurs.

Greg Ip of the WSJ writes, ‘A four-year college degree, seen for generations as a ticket to a better life, is no longer enough to guarantee a steadily rising paycheck.” The article (free via AZCentral) then goes on to highlight the declining value of a college degree in the US.

There are many factors behind this (the massification of college degrees, technological change, economic change, etc.), but what the article neglects to mention is that a degree only has value if you know how to leverage it. In other words, you must have an entrepreneurial mindset.

The people covered in the article bitch and moan that their degree is not getting them jobs that they once could easily get. Duh! In order for your education to work for you, you must work to differentiate it, sell it, etc. Again, you must have an entrepreneurial mindset.

So even if you are not starting a new firm and plan to take a more traditional career path, you must be able to spot opportunities, organize people and resources, and basically make your own destiny, if you are going to hold a position that the author and others once considered ‘guaranteed.’

At WSJ they have some other interesting links related to this idea of the declining value of a college degree.

Last year I took a great course with Prof. David Hart on Science and Technology Policy. One term that comes up often is National Innovation Systems; basically the resources (physical, financial, institutional, educational, human capital, rules/laws, etc) that a nation has and how they are organized and deployed in support of innovation (typically scientific). The idea is that better, more efficient systems should yield higher growth rates and increases in living standards for national populations (and the world for that matter).

While many entrepreneurs don’t often think about the national innovation systems that they access, much of the technology and science that we make use of in the commercial markets are offshoots of directed policy made by politicians, lobbyists, non-profits, government agencies, venture investors and syndicate leaders, etc.

The latest National Dialogue on Entrepreneurship newsletter shares a great new paper by Block and Keller called “Where do Innovations Come from? Transformations in the U.S. National Innovation System of the US 1976-2006″

The way that new products, services, and technologies emerge has changed, and innovation policies need to change in response to this transformed innovation ecosystem. A new study sponsored by the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation analyzes forty years of data from R&D Magazine, which has annually ranked its top 100 innovations since 1976. This historical perspective yields some interesting insights. One major finding is that the role of Federal investments in supporting innovations has grown rapidly. Also, collaboration is more important.

It looks like a pretty interesting paper and entrepreneurs should read it. There are some solid findings and its pretty clear that universities, their campuses, and players are a major part of successful national innovation systems.

Fascinating article by Jonathan Cheng about a Hong Kong based entrepreneur, Lam Sai-wing, in the gold business who created a gold toilet and scored a marketing coup for this business. Something outrageous like a gold toilet (and an entire golden palace) helped grow Lams business by differentiating it from others in the retail jewelry market.

Those odd prices (ie $3.6 at Wal-Mart (which they may be dumping) were created by Sam Walton to grab attention — as did the elephants and other things that Walton used to build the base of small town Wal-Marts that would eventually become the world’s largest retailer. Walton had to do something drastic as he entered the retail market full of new competitors. Wal-Mart, Target, and KMart were all founded in 1959 — and these are just the large, successes that prospered.

I believe that any business, regardless of industry or customer base, can use a golden toilet.

From the article,

He has spent the past decade constructing a palace of gold, decked out in six tons of the precious metal. In recent years, the palace has become an attraction mainland Chinese tour groups couldn’t miss, and a boon for Mr. Lam’s retail jewelry business…

As far as Mr. Lam is concerned, the golden toilet is more than a Guinness World Record-certified, 24-karat, fully functional flushable throne.

Mr. Lam, a former goldsmith, came up with the toilet gimmick in 2001 as he was pushing his jewelry-manufacturing business into a fierce retail market…

As a boy growing up in Cultural Revolution-era China, Mr. Lam, now 53 years old, was obsessed with gold. He says he found himself transfixed with one sentence in Vladimir Lenin’s writing: “When we are victorious on a world scale, I think we shall use gold for the purpose of building public lavatories in the streets of some of the largest cities of the world.”

Lenin’s words alluded to a socialist utopia with no need for money, but Mr. Lam read them as an indictment of the poverty-stricken existence he found himself in. He rarely had meat to eat, and after he turned 7, Mr. Lam struggled to help his single mother and six siblings sell bananas and peanuts.

The textbook market on campuses has always appeared distorted. Hundreds of dollars on books that students often barely touch. Frequent new editions, ‘forcing’ waves of students to purchase new, rather than used, books.

John Hechinger of the WSJ has an interesting article on the rise of custom textbooks and the toll it is taking on students/parents. Basically, specific departments at specific schools are having custom versions of ’standard’ books printed and assigning them to their students (keeping them out of the increasingly global market in textbooks). Moreover, in many cases, the books cannot be sold back and resold on the used market.

The point of sharing the article is to highlight a truth about campus entrepreneurship: EVERYONE IS DOING IT. The article highlights english and other social science departments following this strategy. So students should always keep an entrepreneurial perspective when on campus.

Read below for some excerpts from the article.

The University of Alabama, for instance, requires freshman composition students at its main campus to buy a $59.35 writing textbook titled “A Writer’s Reference,” by Diana Hacker.

The spiral-bound book is nearly identical to the same “A Writer’s Reference” that goes for $30 in the used-book market and costs about $54 new. The only difference in the Alabama version: a 32-page section describing the school’s writing program — which is available for free on the university’s Web site. This version also has the University of Alabama’s name printed across the top of the front cover, and a notice on the back that reads: “This book may not be bought or sold used.”

More,

The custom-textbook business has become the fastest-growing segment of the $3.5 billion market for U.S. new college texts, comprising 12% of sales for 2006, the latest year for which data is available. Royalty deals generate tens of thousands of dollars for some big academic departments. The arrangements have drawn little attention, despite increasing legislative and regulatory scrutiny of the spiraling price of textbooks, which have been rising at twice the rate of inflation over the past two decades.

In 2005, a report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office criticized several textbook industry practices — including frequent new editions and the “bundling” of books with extras like CDs and workbooks — that discourage the purchase of used books and inflate prices for students.

The agency found that college students spend an average of about $900 a year on textbooks. That’s the equivalent of 8% of tuition and fees at the average private four-year college, 26% at a state university and 72% at a community college.

Just found out about The Next Tycoon — a reality show business competition that will be filming in Atlanta in August and will air in September. (the name is a little ‘Trumpish’ for me, but I am just one)

The show/contest is being produced by an Atlanta-based entrepreneur, W. Cliff Oxford whose firm spent three years on the Inc. 500 list. (he also endows the Executive MBA program at Emory’s Goizueta School of Business.) From the article at Marketwatch.com:

The Next Tycoon is a new reality show that will give entrepreneurs from all ages and backgrounds a chance to present their business ideas to key decision makers and outstanding business and media leaders. The show will be a valuable educational resource as well as a fun opportunity for all participants to share and discuss new, exciting business plans…

While the competition is based and will be filmed in Atlanta, it isn’t limited to the region. Anyone who applies through the Web site, www.thenexttycoon.biz, is eligible as long as he or she has a plan for a viable business venture to present onsite.

It appears there is an $85 fee to apply, but that sounds more like a weeder fee more than anything else. This is another example of the various models and actors experimenting and extending the business plan competition.

Check out the site, there are some interesting things in there. For example, there will be at least 100 people presenting in preliminary rounds and they are not allowed to use ppt. Information on participating can be found here. Let us know if you apply.

]]> http://campusentrepreneurship.wordpress.com/2008/07/10/business-plan-competition-reality-show/feed/ Campus Entrepreneurship http://campusentrepreneurship.wordpress.com/2008/07/08/no-venture-backed-ipos-in-q2-1st-time-in-30-years/ http://campusentrepreneurship.wordpress.com/2008/07/08/no-venture-backed-ipos-in-q2-1st-time-in-30-years/#comments Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:59:33 +0000 David Miller http://campusentrepreneurship.wordpress.com/?p=458

For the first time since 1978, no venture backed firms completed an IPO during the second quarter. Mark Hefflinger over at Digital Media wire has a nice posting on this ‘non-event.’

I have always believed that the focus on venture funding is overblown as a vast majority of new firms do not access the VC markets. That said, the statistic (from the National Venture Capital Association) is pretty staggering and underscores the stalled mentality that has gripped our markets (credit and equity).

From the post:

For the first time since 1978, there were no venture-backed initial public offerings (IPOs) during the second quarter, according to a new report from the National Venture Capital Association (NVCA).

The absence of IPOs follows an exceptionally slow first quarter, in which just five venture-backed companies went public.

In the first half of 2007, 43 companies went public.

The NVCA characterized the trend as a “capital markets crisis” for the start-up community.

Look at an oil chart. Its clearly a bubble, right? But how do you know when a bubble is ready to burst?

Check out this WSJ article by Margaret Coker about the price of vanity license plates (or tags) in Abu Dhabi, UAE. Last month, business man Saeed Khouri set a record when he spent $14 million for the tag: “1″. His cousin, a stockbroker, spent $9 million for “5″.

My favorite part of the article is where a 15 year (who can’t drive yet) spends $530,000 for “29″. From the article:

Soft-spoken and modestly dressed, 34-year-old Mr. Al-Mannaei says he closely controls supply, releasing low-digit plates “almost scientifically.” The result, he says, is a frenzy for even mediocre numbers. In the last two auctions, three-digit plates fetched between $123,000 and $150,000 each, more than double the prices last fall. In the 10 auctions held so far, buyers spent roughly $120 million for 900 plates; the government plans to use the money to build a new trauma hospital for traffic-accident victims.

Mr. Al-Mannaei, who declines to provide his remuneration, spices things up from time to time with plates that match popular luxury-car series. The brother of Talal Khouri, the stockbroker who shelled out $9 million for “5,” paid just over $120,000 to furnish his red Ferrari F430 with a “430″ plate. (The car itself lists for approximately $180,000.)

Indeed, the extended Khouri clan, which earned its fortune from the stock market and land development, is one of the license-plate market’s biggest players. Talal, 35, displays his “5″ plate on his cabernet-colored Rolls. He’s also bought “55″ and “55555,” among others.

The “1″ tag bought by Saeed, 25, was a coup for the family, says his 21-year-old younger brother Hamdan. “We are lucky. We have the money to get what we want. We want to be the best,” Hamdan says. For his own car, a Land Rover, Hamdan is eyeing “494,” the number included in his Hotmail user name. Although Hamdan has an order in for a Ferrari F149, set to hit the market next year, a cousin has already snapped up plate “149.”

I was part of the internet frenzy when Business.com sold for something like $15 million, but that was an asset… on par with real estate.. with a path to cash flows (though not easy or guaranteed). But this license plate things seems more like tulips, an artificial market, where the buyers and sellers are blinded by irrationality and the mania of crowds. This to me is a signal that oil has jumped the shark!